Vote: What would we like to see removed from PG3D?

[¬Me¤w§tic]

Armour can only stay as it is, or be reworked. The reworked version would be the protection value of iron armour up3 and no more no less, it should cost 300 coins and 10 gems. You can add attributes to the armour (less damage taken, thorns, more damage dealt, swift movement, high jump, etc) one armour piece can have 1 attribute which each attribute would cost 100 coins and 15 gems (maybe make coins more harder to get and gems a slightly bit easier to earn)

 

[...]

Exactly! Most people tend to forget other people's perspective. Although, I must agree that PG3D has gone down hill lately.
I can also understand why others want to remove all these items, but RiliSoft worked hard to put these items ingame. Simply asking them to remove these items will be in vain.
People only suggest ideas that benefit them. They lack the understanding to see how a company runs. Which is understandable in my terms.
RiliSoft is a business that strives to grow. Without money, they can't hire personnel to work for them.
During 7.0.0 the easiest way to earn coins was already revealed. This caused a major drawback on their budget. So they thought of gems. They made it hard to earn, because they needed the money they lost during 7.0.0.
I'm sure once they earned enough capital, they will surely make gems obtainable.

Let me just clarify my position on this matter. I believe that we must take some personal responsibility when making suggestions because they can have a great impact on the game, therefore we should try to understand some of the negative consequences of any idea put forward. It is very rare for an idea to have no negative consequences for either the developers or the players, however if the benefits outweigh the drawbacks then an idea can become viable. We must keep in mind that it is not in anyone's best interests to proceed with an idea if we have not considered how this will impact the game on both sides. At the same time, I do not put all of the blame on us as a community, I was simply focussing on the playing community since it was they who I was addressing. The developers play the biggest role here as they control what gets put into the game and what gets left out, this is a fundamental part of their business. It is their responsibility to sift through the most viable ideas and implement those which they believe will be most successful. Blackout, your comments about Rilisoft's revenue and budget don't seem to have any evidence behind them because, as far as I am aware, you are not working for Rilisoft. We do not know or need to know what their financial position is since that is a matter for them and them only. Despite the fact that it is their responsibility to sift through ideas, they have not done so, instead it has been left to the efforts of a small group of passionate supporters, who may have little or no business experience or understanding, so we can not be too hard on ourselves for trying. What I have been trying to do is guide our community on how we may form an educated opinion and develop viable ideas, whilst at the same time I have been trying to get Rilisoft to understand that there are some mutually beneficial ideas that this community can provide them with if they take the necessary steps to engage with us and provide feedback. Of course actions speak louder then words and therefore this is my way of gauging whether Rilisoft is indeed interested in moving forward together with the community or is intent on pursuing its own purposes. The discussion is the first step of the process, the updates are the final result. Until it is clear that we are no longer being heard, then we can continue to assist in the betterment of this game.

 

[Curiosity]

Remove the mechs.
Nerf the turret so it has limited ammo, without timer and decrease on damage
Nerf the armor, after that nerf the powerful weapons
Remove the laser minigun. It's too OP and annoying on close quarter maps. I'm really sick of it.
Gems just need to be burned, or make them easier to get same with the coins.

EDIT:

Armour can only stay as it is, or be reworked. The reworked version would be the protection value of iron armour up3 and no more no less, it should cost 300 coins and 10 gems. You can add attributes to the armour (less damage taken, thorns, more damage dealt, swift movement, high jump, etc) one armour piece can have 1 attribute which each attribute would cost 100 coins and 15 gems (maybe make coins more harder to get and gems a slightly bit easier to earn)

"(maybe make coind more harder to get and....."
Just no, they're hard enough to get right now. Sure we still have time survival, but that gives us nothing at all to actually keep up on the latest weapons.

 

[¬Me¤w§tic]

"(maybe make coind more harder to get and....."
Just no, they're hard enough to get right now. Sure we still have time survival, but that gives us nothing at all to actually keep up on the latest weapons.

Coins arent that hard to get, sure time survival is lenthy but considering that it takes almost no effort to farm in time survival, the coin gain from it need to be nerfed

 

[Curiosity]

Coins arent that hard to get, sure time survival is lenthy but considering that it takes almost no effort to farm in time survival, the coin gain from it need to be nerfed

If they remove that, that would be our last way to get some coins. Remember you can't always win a 15 minute match

 

[Gatorrex]

If they remove that, that would be our last way to get some coins. Remember you can't always win a 15 minute match

Plus, you get less coins even if you win every match compared to time survival. Normal dm and tdm should have higher rewards especially since they are harder to win.

 

[...]

Coins arent that hard to get, sure time survival is lenthy but considering that it takes almost no effort to farm in time survival, the coin gain from it need to be nerfed

Given that it is already several times harder to earn the coins or gems required to purchase a certain weapon as opposed to earning that money with even the most basic job, making coins harder to get will not have any impact on whether someone is willing to pay for them or not. If someone is not willing to pay for them now, they never will be. If they wish to increase IAPs, they need to offer more value or more interesting content. By more value I mean, adding in more features to the game which coins can be spent on, yet are still relevant to the game. Or perhaps instead of simply selling coins, they could sell a bundle, with a unique bonus item, like a unique gun skin for example. By 'more interesting' I understand that this is a subjective statement, which is why we need more discussion with the developers to work out what it is that we would find interesting, so that they could then better focus their efforts on making more desirable and successful updates in the future.

 

[Baconatur]

In my opinion, these things should be removed.
- Crossbows and bows. Everybody hates them.
- all plasma weapons, since they're just horrible (except the plasma releaser)
- the shoot through wall feature
- dragon breath, since it is too OP
- FREAKING RUBY ARMOR
- the new coin system. Return the old coin system. Hey @RiliSoft, ya hearing this?
- dark mage wand
- FREAKING DATERS!!!!! Although it's a problem being fixed and the dater hater did have a positive effect on this problem.
- gems

I agree with everything , except bows , I liked them WHEN they had infinite ammo , just for survival.

 

[...]

Less than 3 days are left until this poll closes, for those that haven't voted please do. It'd be great if we could get to 50 votes before time runs out, currently we have 47 votes. The results will be displayed publicly when this poll closes.

 

[...]

For everyone that has followed and supported this thread, I regret to inform you all that after 'closely watching' this thread for almost a month, Rilisoft has finally responded by stating that this thread is essentially redundant. Despite stating that they would hold 'weekly sessions' to discuss ideas and provide feedback on them, they have now stated that they feel that this would constitute giving away 'trade secrets'......? No this is not a joke, this was their response, given just days before they were supposed to begin these sessions. Essentially they want us to give them ideas in the suggestions thread and they'll get back to us....or not. I apologise to everyone who has assisted in this discussion here, I'm sure some of you felt that this would eventuate anyway. I am not upset for trying, in fact it is almost a relief that I have at least tried to reach an outcome and have come to a conclusion. Thanks to everyone who has voted, sorry I could not change anything, hopefully this can at least allow us all to move on and focus on far more important issues where our efforts can bring about a positive change.

I am happy for this to become a locked thread now.