Armor discussion

do u think armor should be...

  • removed from pg3d

    Votes: 4 12.9%

  • severely nerfed

    Votes: 2 6.5%

  • stay as they are

    Votes: 8 25.8%

  • slightly nerf it and add some cons

    Votes: 17 54.8%
  • Total voters
    31
Ruby Rose said:
That is what I meant. Wooden armor has higher mobility than ruby armor. Except Wooden armor has less protection than Ruby or other armor too. There should be also be like make a certain armor stronger and weaker against a different types of gun. For example, Wooden armor would be weak against fire like weapons and stronger against ice like weapons.
Click to expand...
Yes, but instead of wooden armor, there should be light ruby armor with only 30 armor and +20 mobility. Wood armor only have like 5 armor, and thats not merely enough health to survive a half second from almost every weapon in the game now. Armor is basically compulsory for higher level players to survive.

I dont really like the idea of certain armor stronger or weaker for different types of weapons. It will be like pokemon but you can only bring 1 of each category of weapons, and theres like 5 different armor types. And also, there is a 'hide armor' option players can choose so that other players cannot see their armor. Plus, the gameplay will be much more complicated especially for a shooter game and even amateur players would not be able to adapt to this gameplay change. Pixel gun is a shooter game, not a strategy game.
 
Gatorrex said:
Yes, but instead of wooden armor, there should be light ruby armor with only 30 armor and +20 mobility. Wood armor only have like 5 armor, and thats not merely enough health to survive a half second from almost every weapon in the game now. Armor is basically compulsory for higher level players to survive.

I dont really like the idea of certain armor stronger or weaker for different types of weapons. It will be like pokemon but you can only bring 1 of each category of weapons, and theres like 5 different armor types. And also, there is a 'hide armor' option players can choose so that other players cannot see their armor. Plus, the gameplay will be much more complicated especially for a shooter game and even amateur players would not be able to adapt to this gameplay change. Pixel gun is a shooter game, not a strategy game.
Click to expand...
I strongly disagree! Why not just create a idea where the rest of the world haven't seen yet? I mean I'm sick and tired of shooters (e.g., Call of Duty, Battlefield, etc).
 
DirectorScorm said:
I strongly disagree! Why not just create a idea where the rest of the world haven't seen yet? I mean I'm sick and tired of shooters (e.g., Call of Duty, Battlefield, etc).
Click to expand...
MECH= titian from titianfall, or Goliath from cod advanced warfare.
Turrets=sentry guns from cod.
Ruby armored player=cod juggernaut
 
DirectorScorm said:
I strongly disagree! Why not just create a idea where the rest of the world haven't seen yet? I mean I'm sick and tired of shooters (e.g., Call of Duty, Battlefield, etc).
Click to expand...
Wait, do you disagree to the light/heavy armor idea or the different types of armor being weaker/stronger to certain guns?
 
Gatorrex said:
Wait, do you disagree to the light/heavy armor idea or the different types of armor being weaker/stronger to certain guns?
Click to expand...
Yeah cod does it all the time. Enemy Juggernauts are seen all the time on your radar. They are super slow. An have crappy weapons and can't have other guns that they find on the ground as well as no perks. But they have awesome armor.
That's why we disagree because pixel gun is almost copying those games if this idea is used. And why demote armor! We all have the same and equal opportunity to be op and use armor. The highest skilled players worked for the armor. Those who haven't have weaker armor. But we all get better. We all have skill. And we all can easily have RUBY ARMOR!
Those who complain about not having it are just not willing to work for it.
 
TheRussian said:
Yeah cod does it all the time. Enemy Juggernauts are seen all the time on your radar. They are super slow. An have crappy weapons and can't have other guns that they find on the ground as well as no perks. But they have awesome armor.
That's why we disagree because pixel gun is almost copying those games if this idea is used. And why demote armor! We all have the same and equal opportunity to be op and use armor. The highest skilled players worked for the armor. Those who haven't have weaker armor. But we all get better. We all have skill. And we all can easily have RUBY ARMOR!
Those who complain about not having it are just not willing to work for it.
Click to expand...
I don't want Ruby Armor but it's not because I'm not willing to work for it. I just have better things to spend my coins(which I have worked hard for) on. I just wished armor wasn't added at all. PG3D would of been better off without it.
 
Ruby Rose said:
I don't want Ruby Armor but it's not because I'm not willing to work for it. I just have better things to spend my coins(which I have worked hard for) on. I just wished armor wasn't added at all. PG3D would of been better off without it.
Click to expand...
That's why the players that spent real money on coins to buy armor may be very very very unhappy if it were to be removed. Dont get me wrong i hate armor but its too late to take it away
 
TheRussian said:
Yeah cod does it all the time. Enemy Juggernauts are seen all the time on your radar. They are super slow. An have crappy weapons and can't have other guns that they find on the ground as well as no perks. But they have awesome armor.
That's why we disagree because pixel gun is almost copying those games if this idea is used. And why demote armor! We all have the same and equal opportunity to be op and use armor. The highest skilled players worked for the armor. Those who haven't have weaker armor. But we all get better. We all have skill. And we all can easily have RUBY ARMOR!
Those who complain about not having it are just not willing to work for it.
Click to expand...
Lol i actually didnt know about that cod juggernaut thing before i suggested that. Yes, i do use ruby armor but the reason why i want to nerf armor is because primary weapons take too long to kill raps. You have to rely on your prototype or agb mostly to kill raps, especially when you are fighting 2+ raps at the same time. And if your thinking 'why not just buff all the primaries?', that would take forever to do and all of those upgrades would just cost gems, and rilisoft would probably mess that up and make a super op weapon, so a faster and safer solution is just to nerf armor.
 
Gatorrex said:
Lol i actually didnt know about that cod juggernaut thing before i suggested that. Yes, i do use ruby armor but the reason why i want to nerf armor is because primary weapons take too long to kill raps. You have to rely on your prototype or agb mostly to kill raps, especially when you are fighting 2+ raps at the same time. And if your thinking 'why not just buff all the primaries?', that would take forever to do and all of those upgrades would just cost gems, and rilisoft would probably mess that up and make a super op weapon, so a faster and safer solution is just to nerf armor.
Click to expand...
I understand what you meant, @Gatorrex, but what's the point of armor if it's nerfed?
 
DirectorScorm said:
I understand what you meant, @Gatorrex, but what's the point of armor if it's nerfed?
Click to expand...
Well, to be honest, armor is just something to use your coins on. Heres my theory of what would happen if armor and weapons are 100% balanced, because thats what everyone wants, right?
A player just started pixel gun. He can only use weak weapons and fight unarmored players. When the player levels up and gets more coins to buy better weapons and armor, he will have to fight higher level players with better guns and armor. So the player has to choose on what to spend coins on: better weapons or better armor, or both. If the player chooses better weapons, his kills/time will increase but death/time will also increase (because he will fight players with better weapons). If he chooses to spend coins on armor, his kills/time will decrease (because he is fighting higher armored players) but his death/time will also decrease. If he chooses to spread the coins he gained on armor and weapons, his kills/time and deaths/time will be the same. The player will have to constantly play more to get coins, but he will also have to fight higher level players the more he plays. Well, this would only happen if theres infinite levels and infinite guns, which is impossible...
Ugh, just ignore this, i explained this horribly bad. Just nerf armor because armor is too strong/guns are too weak
 
Last edited:
Gatorrex said:
Well, to be honest, armor is just something to use your coins on. Heres my theory of what would happen if armor and weapons are 100% balanced, because thats what everyone wants, right?
A player just started pixel gun. He can only use weak weapons and fight unarmored players. When the player levels up and gets more coins to buy better weapons and armor, he will have to fight higher level players with better guns and armor. So the player has to choose on what to spend coins on: better weapons or better armor, or both. If the player chooses better weapons, his kills/time will increase but death/time will also increase (because he will fight players with better weapons). If he chooses to spend coins on armor, his kills/time will decrease (because he is fighting higher armored players) but his death/time will also decrease. If he chooses to spread the coins he gained on armor and weapons, his kills/time and deaths/time will be the same. The player will have to constantly play more to get coins, but he will also have to fight higher level players the more he plays. Well, this would only happen if theres infinite levels and infinite guns, which is impossible...
Ugh, just ignore this, i explained this horribly bad. Just nerf armor because armor is too strong/guns are too weak
Click to expand...
By the way, you don't always have to play Multiplayer: which means you don't have to face players with overpowered weapons.

Anyways, I'd rather have no armor, then having armor nerfed itself.
 
Aha! I got the best idea ever! Remove the helmet, keep everything else the same! Players who bought the helmet before gets refunded. Simple as that. Ill let you guys decide on the pros and cons.
 
TheRussian said:
Yeah cod does it all the time. Enemy Juggernauts are seen all the time on your radar. They are super slow. An have crappy weapons and can't have other guns that they find on the ground as well as no perks. But they have awesome armor.
That's why we disagree because pixel gun is almost copying those games if this idea is used. And why demote armor! We all have the same and equal opportunity to be op and use armor. The highest skilled players worked for the armor. Those who haven't have weaker armor. But we all get better. We all have skill. And we all can easily have RUBY ARMOR!
Those who complain about not having it are just not willing to work for it.
Click to expand...

This right here. People dont understand that it's NOT impossible to get Ruby Armor (and possibly stronger armor in the future). You can play in coop survival and just kill monsters. NOT RAPS. And you'll get a lot of coins if you win in there. Play offline survival. Yeah,a lot of you are complaining saying,"One coin per round?! Thats awful!!". Hey,atleast you're earning something.
 
†Youncé† said:
This right here. People dont understand that it's NOT impossible to get Ruby Armor (and possibly stronger armor in the future). You can play in coop survival and just kill monsters. NOT RAPS. And you'll get a lot of coins if you win in there. Play offline survival. Yeah,a lot of you are complaining saying,"One coin per round?! Thats awful!!". Hey,atleast you're earning something.
Click to expand...
Coins aint the problem, gems is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top